Legal Compliance70/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and the submission period (19 days from today's date) is reasonable for a below-threshold contract. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and a liable person are notable compliance gaps.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
Clarity65/100
The project description and technical requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100
While basic information, value, duration, and location are provided, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit lack of financial requirements, mandatory exclusion grounds, and, most critically, evaluation criteria. The status of the 'Official PDF Version' being 'Not Required' is also unusual.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Missing financial requirements
Fairness55/100
The tender's fairness is significantly compromised by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, making the assessment process opaque. The requirement for bidders to be UK-based SMEs, while common for local procurement, restricts competition and access for other qualified entities.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Eligibility restricted to UK-based SMEs
Practicality60/100
The tender specifies electronic submission and provides clear contract start and duration dates. However, the absence of a direct URL for accessing full tender documents presents a significant practical barrier for interested contractors.
•No direct document URL provided
Data Consistency70/100
Most core data points like dates, value, and classification are consistent. However, the tender lacks population for several key fields (liable person, explicit financial/exclusion requirements) and presents a contradiction regarding e-submission between AI-extracted requirements and automated checks.
•Missing liable person
•Contradiction on e-submission support
Sustainability45/100
The project description inherently includes environmental aspects by focusing on bank stabilization and natural vegetation establishment to limit crayfish activity. However, the tender does not explicitly incorporate broader green, social, or innovation-focused procurement criteria.
•No explicit green, social, or innovation criteria