Recruitment services

The overall tender quality is moderate to poor due to critical deficiencies such as an inconsistent contract start date, missing evaluation criteria, and the absence of e-submission capabilities.

The contract start date being in the past (2023-05-23) for an active tender with a future submission deadline (2031-05-23) represents a significant legal and procedural inconsistency. While the DPS mechanism itself is compliant, the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the provided summary is also a concern.

While the description of the Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) is clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria for both the selection stage and subsequent mini-competitions significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders. The lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements further contributes to ambiguity.

Basic tender information is present, but critical elements such as detailed evaluation criteria, comprehensive mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements are either missing or only vaguely referenced in the provided summary. The inconsistency of the contract start date also impacts completeness, and only one document summary out of four is provided.

The open access to the DPS selection stage throughout its life is a positive aspect for fairness. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity. Furthermore, the lack of e-submission functionality creates a barrier to equal access for all potential bidders.

The absence of e-submission functionality is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, especially in 2026. The inconsistent contract start date also introduces practical confusion regarding the tender's current status and operational timeline.

The most critical data inconsistency is the contract start date (2023-05-23) being in the past relative to today's date (2026-01-18) for an active tender with a future submission deadline (2031-05-23). This creates significant confusion about the tender's lifecycle. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The tender information provided indicates a complete absence of any green procurement, social criteria, or innovation focus. This suggests no integration of sustainability considerations into the procurement process.