Commercial Portfolio

This tender for commercial portfolio surveys is generally clear and transparent regarding its scope and award criteria, but suffers from significant gaps in the provided documentation, particularly concerning legal and eligibility requirements, and lacks modern e-submission capabilities.

The procedure type and CPV codes are clearly defined, and no disputes are noted. However, the reveal date is missing, and mandatory exclusion/eligibility grounds are not detailed in the provided summary, requiring bidders to consult full documents, which is a transparency and disclosure gap.

The description of services, technical requirements, and evaluation criteria (100% price) are clear and unambiguous. However, the deferral of mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements to full documents reduces the overall clarity of the provided summary.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are specified. However, the reveal date is missing, only one out of four tender documents is summarized, and key legal/eligibility requirements are explicitly stated as not detailed in the provided information, indicating significant incompleteness.

The estimated value is disclosed, evaluation criteria are objective (100% price), and requirements appear generic. However, the absence of e-submission capabilities significantly hinders equal access and fairness for potential bidders. Full document access cannot be confirmed from the provided data.

The contract start date and duration are clear. However, the lack of electronic submission support and a direct document URL creates practical hurdles for bidders. There is also a currency inconsistency between the estimated value (EUR) and the stated budget (£GBP).

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes are 'N/A', the reveal date is missing, and there's a notable inconsistency between the estimated value in EUR and the budget in GBP.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.