Day Opportunities

This tender provides a clear service description but suffers from significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness due to missing evaluation criteria and financial requirements, alongside a lack of e-submission.

The tender correctly identifies the legal framework (Procurement Act 2023) and procedure type, with appropriate CPV codes and reasonable deadlines. However, the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance issue regarding transparency and equal treatment, impacting the score.

The service description and target groups are clear, and basic eligibility and technical requirements are understandable. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria and specific financial requirements creates significant ambiguity for potential bidders, severely impacting clarity.

Basic information, estimated value, duration, and location are well-provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical omission of specific financial requirements and, most importantly, detailed evaluation criteria. The 'Required: No' for the official PDF is also an unusual data point.

The tender aims for multiple contracts and discloses the value, which are positive for fairness. However, the complete lack of evaluation criteria makes the process opaque and inherently unfair, as bidders cannot understand the basis of award. The absence of e-submission also hinders equal access.

Contract start and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback for bidders, making the submission process less efficient and accessible. A direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the summary.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include 'Liable Person' being empty and 'Code: N/A' for procedure type, but these do not significantly detract from overall consistency.

While the core service inherently addresses significant social needs, the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate broader sustainability criteria (environmental, social value beyond the core service, innovation) for bidders, nor is it EU funded.