Legal Compliance75/100
The procedure type and CPV codes are correctly identified, and there are no reported disputes. The long application period for a DPS is appropriate. However, the missing reveal date is a minor transparency issue, and the summary's explicit lack of detail on mandatory exclusion grounds, while directing to full documents, is a slight concern for immediate clarity.
•Missing reveal date
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed in summary
Clarity65/100
The tender's purpose and target audience are clearly articulated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria for DPS admission or subsequent contract awards, along with general technical and financial requirements in the summary, significantly reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Technical/financial requirements are general in summary
Completeness60/100
While essential basic information, value, and duration are present, the summary explicitly states that mandatory exclusion grounds, specific financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are not detailed. This necessitates referring to external documents, making the provided summary incomplete.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed in summary
•Financial requirements not detailed in summary
Fairness60/100
The requirements appear generic and not tailored, and the DPS model with a long application window promotes broad access. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria for admission and subsequent contract awards significantly undermines the transparency and objectivity essential for a fair process.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100
The tender indicates E-Procurement, which is practical. However, the absence of a direct document URL is a practical hurdle. The mention of delivery from August 2023 while the submission deadline is 2027-07-31 could cause confusion regarding the DPS's operational timeline.
•Document URL not provided
•Ambiguity regarding DPS start date vs. submission deadline
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields are mostly populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical within the context of a DPS, with a long application period. Minor omissions like 'Liable Person' do not significantly impact overall consistency.
•Liable Person field empty
Sustainability50/100
The tender has a strong social dimension, focusing on improving skills and employment for adults, which directly addresses social sustainability. However, it lacks explicit criteria or focus on environmental (green) procurement or innovation.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit innovation focus