United Kingdom1515 days leftOpen

CHC Nursing Home Beds Preferred Provider List- NHS Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes ICB

Tender Overview

LOCATION

United Kingdom, United Kingdom

VALUE

Not disclosed

DEADLINE

March 28, 2030 at 16:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

85100000

REFERENCE

009218-2023

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

NHS Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes Integrated Care Board (BLMK ICB) (formerly<br/>CCG) is inviting expressions of interest from suitably qualified providers of CHC Nursing<br/>Homes Beds (“the service”), to be delivered across the population of Bedfordshire, Luton and<br/>Milton Keynes.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be a suitably qualified provider of CHC Nursing Home Beds.
  • Be capable of delivering the service across the population of Bedfordshire, Luton, and Milton Keynes.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Demonstrate suitable qualifications and expertise for providing CHC Nursing Home Beds.
  • Possess the operational capacity to deliver services across Bedfordshire, Luton, and Milton Keynes.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, financial stability thresholds) are detailed in the provided information.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit an expression of interest.
  • Ensure submission is made by the deadline: 2030-03-28 16:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF009218-2023_official.pdf
Summary:
This document is a contract notice from NHS Bedfordshire, Luton and Milton Keynes ICB inviting expressions of interest from suitably qualified providers for CHC Nursing Home Beds across Bedfordshire, Luton, and Milton Keynes.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

61
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender provides basic information and utilizes an open procedure with e-procurement, but suffers from significant deficiencies in clarity, completeness, and fairness due to missing detailed requirements and evaluation criteria. A major data inconsistency regarding the contract start date raises serious concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly. However, the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed financial requirements in the provided information is a notable omission. Critically, the contract start date (2023-03-31) being in the past for an active 'Open procedure' inviting expressions of interest presents a significant procedural anomaly.

Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing specific financial requirements
Clarity50/100

While the service description is clear, the eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements are either vague or entirely absent. A critical deficiency is the explicit lack of specified evaluation criteria, making it difficult for potential bidders to understand the basis for assessment.

Vague eligibility and technical requirements
No specific financial requirements detailed
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, organization, and description is present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like specific mandatory exclusion grounds, detailed financial requirements, and, most importantly, evaluation criteria are missing from the provided tender information.

Estimated value not disclosed (classified)
Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness65/100

The tender benefits from being an open procedure and enabling e-procurement. However, the classified estimated value and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria severely undermine transparency and equal treatment. The vague nature of the eligibility and technical requirements also introduces potential for subjective assessment.

Estimated value not disclosed (classified)
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date being in the past for an active tender inviting new expressions of interest is a significant practical inconsistency. Specific financing information beyond the classified value is also not available.

Contract start date (2023-03-31) is in the past for an active 'Open procedure' tender
No specific financing information available
Data Consistency40/100

The most critical inconsistency is the contract start date (2023-03-31) being in the past, while the tender is listed as 'active' and an 'Open procedure' inviting 'expressions of interest' as of today's date (2026-01-18). This fundamental discrepancy significantly impacts the reliability and understanding of the procurement process.

Contract start date (2023-03-31) is in the past for an active tender (2026-01-18) with an open procedure
Sustainability20/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided tender information. This indicates a lack of integration of sustainability considerations into the procurement process.

No green procurement criteria mentioned
No social aspects or considerations mentioned

Strengths

Clear service description and scope
Open procedure and E-Procurement enabled
CPV and NUTS codes are appropriately assigned
Tender is divided into parts, potentially aiding SME access
Contract duration is clearly specified

Concerns

Contract start date is in the past for an active open tender
No specific evaluation criteria are provided
Eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are vague or missing
Estimated value is not disclosed (classified)
Absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds

Recommendations

1. Clarify the discrepancy regarding the contract start date and the active 'Open procedure' status to ensure procedural integrity.
2. Provide detailed, objective, and measurable evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness for all bidders.
3. Specify clear and comprehensive eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, including standard mandatory exclusion grounds.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
61/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes