Short Term hire of Vehicles - DPS

This tender for a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for vehicle hire provides basic information but critically lacks detailed requirements and evaluation criteria, relying heavily on an external portal. This impacts clarity, completeness, and fairness, despite a very generous submission deadline.

The tender defines a CPV code and indicates an active status. However, there is a contradiction between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)', which needs clarification for full legal compliance. The missing reveal date is a transparency concern, and the classified value, while permissible, reduces transparency.

The service description is clear. However, the AI-extracted requirements (mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial) are not detailed in the provided summary, instead directing bidders to an external website. Crucially, evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as missing, which is a significant clarity issue.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, CPV, and NUTS code are present. However, the tender is incomplete regarding specific details for exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements, and entirely lacks evaluation criteria, requiring external consultation for substantive content.

The classified value reduces transparency. The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as bidders cannot understand the basis for assessment. While e-procurement is enabled and the submission deadline is very long, the lack of transparent evaluation criteria significantly undermines fairness.

Electronic submission is supported, and a URL for full documents is provided, which are practical aspects. The contract duration is specified. However, the contract start date is not known, and detailed financing information (beyond classified value) is absent.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the contradiction between 'Restricted procedure' and 'Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)' represents a significant inconsistency in the procedural definition. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

There is no indication within the provided tender information that it incorporates green procurement principles, social aspects, or an innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded.