PRO004990-Services-Framework-Centirfuge and Associated Maintenance Service Operators

This tender provides a clear service description but is significantly hampered by the absence of evaluation criteria and lack of e-submission, impacting transparency and fairness. While basic information is present, the overall quality is moderate due to these critical omissions.

While the submission deadline from today's date is reasonable, the absence of a 'reveal date' prevents full verification of the legally mandated minimum publication period. The procedure type is stated but lacks a specific code or detailed definition, which could be clearer. CPV codes and status are correctly assigned.

The service description and technical requirements are clearly articulated and unambiguous. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria significantly hinders clarity, as bidders cannot fully understand how their proposals will be assessed, leading to potential ambiguity in the selection process.

Basic information, financial details, and timeline are well-defined and present. Key requirements are extracted and listed. However, the absence of evaluation criteria is a significant gap, and the summary of only 1 out of 4 attached documents suggests potential for further missing information in the provided snippet.

The tender value is disclosed, and the technical requirements appear generic and appropriate for the specialized service, not overtly tailored. However, the lack of transparent evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness by introducing subjectivity into the assessment. The absence of e-submission also creates an unnecessary barrier to equal access and efficiency for potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, which is practical for planning. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, increasing administrative burden. A direct document URL was not provided in the snippet, impacting immediate accessibility.

Key dates, financial figures, and classification data are logical and consistent across the provided information. There are no disputes or suspensions reported. Minor fields like 'Liable Person' are unpopulated, and procedure codes are 'N/A', but these do not impact the core consistency of the tender data.

The tender does not indicate any explicit focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process, which is increasingly expected in public tenders.