Keys Academies Trust - Condition Surveys

This tender provides basic project details but suffers from critical deficiencies, including the absence of evaluation criteria, missing detailed mandatory requirements, and a significant discrepancy in document availability, severely impacting its completeness, clarity, and fairness.

The tender lacks a clear reveal date, which is a basic transparency requirement. More critically, the AI summary indicates an absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance in public procurement.

While the project description is clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged, severely compromising the overall clarity of the procurement process. Technical requirements are generic but understandable.

The tender is critically incomplete. There's a significant discrepancy between the stated '4 total' documents and only '1 processed' document. Furthermore, the AI summary explicitly highlights the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, financial, and evaluation criteria, which are essential components of a complete tender package.

The absence of evaluation criteria is a fundamental flaw, rendering the tender process opaque, non-transparent, and inherently unfair as bidders cannot understand the basis of selection. The lack of e-submission also reduces equal access, and questionable document access further compromises fairness.

The lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially creating barriers for bidders. While contract dates and duration are clear, the absence of e-submission reduces the practicality and ease of participation.

Most key fields are populated and dates are logical. However, the discrepancy between the total number of documents and those processed is a notable inconsistency. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The tender shows no indication of incorporating green procurement principles, social aspects, or an innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.