Legal Compliance75/100
The tender correctly identifies the procedure as a DPS under the Public Contract Regulations 2015 and uses an appropriate CPV code. No disputes are reported. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the provided summary is a transparency concern, impacting full legal compliance regarding tender clarity.
•No evaluation criteria specified in the provided summary.
Clarity80/100
The description of the DPS scope, duration, and value bands is clear and unambiguous. AI-extracted requirements are well-structured and understandable. The primary clarity issue is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which leaves bidders uncertain about the assessment methodology.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100
Basic information, financial details, duration, and key requirements are largely present. The tender provides a URL for full documents. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and a 'Liable Person' field, along with a missing 'reveal date', indicates some gaps in completeness.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
•Missing 'Liable Person' information.
Fairness85/100
The tender promotes fairness through full document access via a portal, disclosed value, and a very generous submission period typical for a DPS, allowing ample time for suppliers to join. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. The main detractor is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which reduces transparency in the assessment process.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency of assessment.
Practicality65/100
A document URL is provided, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The mention of an 'In-Tend portal' suggests electronic submission, which is practical. However, the automated check flagging 'No e-submission' creates a contradiction that lowers the practicality score, as this is a significant hurdle if true.
•Contradiction regarding e-submission support (portal mentioned, but automated check flags 'No e-submission').
Data Consistency90/100
Key fields are mostly populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent with the nature of a Dynamic Purchasing System, which commenced in 2022 and remains open for submissions until 2027.
Sustainability50/100
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus in the provided information. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria.