Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure and references national law, but the missing mandatory exclusion grounds and the requirement for an NDA prior to document release raise concerns about full compliance and transparency. The CPV code is also slightly misaligned with the product.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•NDA required before document release
Clarity80/100
While the procurement process steps are clearly outlined, the absence of specified evaluation criteria, financial requirements, and detailed technical specifications significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Vague technical requirements
Completeness70/100
Basic tender information is well-provided, but the critical absence of the full tender documentation (requiring an NDA first), mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed evaluation/financial criteria makes the tender incomplete.
•Full tender documentation not immediately accessible
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness85/100
The requirement for an NDA before accessing tender documents and the complete absence of evaluation criteria are significant barriers to fair competition and transparency. While the value is disclosed and e-procurement is enabled, these omissions are critical.
•NDA required before full document access
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission is supported, and key dates are provided. However, the necessity to register on a portal and sign an NDA before accessing the main tender documents adds an unnecessary practical hurdle for potential bidders.
•NDA required before document access
•No direct document URL
Data Consistency90/100
The tender information is largely consistent with populated key fields and logical dates. Minor omissions like the 'Liable Person' field and N/A codes for procedure type are present but do not impact overall consistency significantly.
•"Liable Person" field empty
•N/A codes for Type/Procedure
Sustainability50/100
The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, nor is it EU funded, indicating a neutral stance on sustainability considerations.
•No sustainability, social, or innovation criteria