DPS For Energy Efficiency Retrofit Installation Contractors

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System for energy efficiency retrofit works, demonstrating a clear focus on green and social procurement. However, the lack of detailed procurement documents, specific evaluation criteria, and a disclosed estimated value significantly impacts its completeness and fairness.

The tender explicitly references the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, indicating adherence to national procurement law. CPV codes are appropriate, and no disputes are reported. However, the 'Restricted (Code: N/A)' for procedure type is slightly vague, the estimated value is classified, and the liable person is missing, which are minor compliance gaps for a public notice. The missing reveal date prevents full assessment of initial notice period reasonableness.

The description of the DPS and its purpose is clear and unambiguous. However, the AI-extracted requirements are high-level and consistently defer to 'full procurement documents' for specifics. Crucially, evaluation criteria are not specified in the provided information, which is a significant clarity issue for potential bidders.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration are present. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the provided content is a contract notice (F02) that directs to 'full procurement documents' which are not included in this analysis. This means detailed requirements and evaluation criteria are missing from the provided tender package.

The tender supports e-procurement and states it's divided into parts, which generally promotes fairness. However, the classified estimated value reduces transparency, and the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major concern, as bidders cannot objectively understand how their submissions will be assessed. The requirements appear generic and not tailored.

Electronic submission is explicitly supported, which is a strong practical advantage. The contract duration is clear. However, a direct URL to the full procurement documents or submission platform is not provided, and the contract start date and detailed financing information (beyond classified value) are missing.

The provided data is largely consistent. Key fields like title, reference, organization, description, deadline, CPV, and duration are populated and logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor gaps include the missing liable person and classified estimated value.

The tender focuses on 'energy efficiency retrofit installation works', inherently aligning with green procurement principles. 'Social Criteria' are explicitly listed as a characteristic, and the works primarily target 'social housing'. There is no explicit mention of an innovation focus, and it is not EU funded.