My Life PDSP

This tender for a Pseudo Dynamic Purchasing System (PDSP) by Wakefield Council is generally well-structured in its basic information and scope, but suffers from significant gaps in detailed requirements and transparency, particularly regarding evaluation criteria.

The procedure type (Open, PDSP) and CPV codes are clearly defined and appropriate. The long submission period is suitable for a PDSP. However, the absence of a reveal date and the lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the provided summary are notable compliance gaps.

The overall purpose and scope of the PDSP, including target service user groups, are clearly described. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and the lack of detailed financial and exclusion requirements significantly reduce clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information, estimated value, and contract duration are provided. The tender is divided into parts. However, the lack of summarized content for crucial documents like the 'Service Specification' and 'Contract Agreement', along with the missing evaluation criteria, makes the tender incomplete from an analytical perspective.

The tender benefits from a very long submission period and the explicit mention of e-procurement, promoting equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a significant fairness concern, as it hinders transparent assessment of applications.

E-procurement is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the absence of a direct document URL, a specific contract start date, and detailed financing information (beyond the estimated value) reduces the practicality for interested parties.

Key fields are mostly populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline, with a 2022 reference and 2027 submission deadline, is logical for a long-running PDSP. The 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are marked N/A, which are minor inconsistencies.

While the core service addresses significant social needs (care for vulnerable groups), the tender does not explicitly incorporate broader green procurement, additional social clauses, or innovation-focused criteria into the procurement process itself.