Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines an open procedure and provides a reasonable submission period of 40 days. However, the CPV code might be slightly misaligned with the primary service, and the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance gaps. The missing reveal date is also a concern.
•Potentially misaligned CPV code (30210000 for software/tools)
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds stated
Clarity80/100
The description of the framework's scope and the technical requirements are very clear and well-defined, particularly regarding alignment with the Forensic Science Regulators Code of Practice. The major drawback is the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is critical for bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic tender information, financial details, and timeline are well-provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit lack of evaluation criteria, missing mandatory exclusion grounds, and the highly problematic statement that the "Official PDF Version" is "Required: No" while only one document is summarized out of four.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No explicit mandatory exclusion grounds stated
Fairness85/100
The tender's requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, aiming to include all relevant suppliers. The value is disclosed, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, the absence of evaluation criteria, lack of e-submission, and ambiguous document access significantly detract from overall fairness and transparency.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality65/100
Key practical details like contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission capabilities and the absence of a direct document URL (implied by "Documents available" but no link) present significant practical hurdles for bidders.
•No e-submission
•No direct document URL provided
Data Consistency90/100
The tender generally exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and populated key fields. Minor inconsistencies include the empty "Liable Person" field, missing procedure codes, and a discrepancy in the total number of documents versus those summarized.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
•Missing procedure codes (N/A)
Sustainability50/100
The tender positively includes "Innovation Focus" and "Social Criteria" as characteristics. However, it explicitly lacks "green procurement" aspects and is not EU funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.