Legal Compliance40/100
The tender lacks specified evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance. The absence of a liable person also indicates incomplete mandatory disclosure.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Clarity35/100
The description of goods and lots is generally clear, but the complete absence of evaluation criteria makes it impossible for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged. Significant inconsistencies in estimated value (EUR vs GBP) and contract duration further reduce clarity.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Inconsistent estimated value currency (EUR vs GBP)
Completeness40/100
While basic information like title, reference, and organization is present, critical elements such as detailed evaluation criteria, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements are missing. The liable person is also not specified.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Missing specific mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness35/100
The absence of clear evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness, as bidders cannot prepare competitive offers based on transparent assessment methods. The lack of electronic submission also creates barriers to equal access for potential suppliers.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•No electronic submission supported
Practicality30/100
The tender's practicality is significantly hampered by the lack of electronic submission, which is a major drawback in modern procurement. Inconsistencies in estimated value and contract duration also complicate practical planning for bidders.
•No electronic submission supported
•Inconsistent estimated value currency
Data Consistency35/100
There are significant data inconsistencies, most notably the discrepancy between the estimated value in EUR and the values provided in GBP within the description. The stated contract duration also conflicts with the description, and the liable person is missing.
•Inconsistent estimated value currency (EUR vs GBP)
•Inconsistent contract duration (27 months vs 26+12 months)
Sustainability20/100
The tender makes no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a complete absence of sustainability considerations.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social aspects included