Surfacing and Supply of Quarried Materials 2025

This tender for surfacing and quarried materials is generally clear in its scope and requirements but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria, full document access, and e-submission, impacting fairness and completeness. It also lacks modern sustainability and social considerations.

The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined and appropriate. The submission period (from today's date) is reasonable. However, the missing reveal date and, critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria are significant compliance issues. The 'Required: No' for the main PDF document is also a concern for full disclosure.

The description of the contract scope and the AI-extracted requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders regarding how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and location are present. However, the critical absence of the full tender documents (beyond a 'tender notice' marked 'Required: No') and the missing evaluation criteria are significant gaps, making the tender incomplete.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the technical requirements appear generic. However, the lack of full document access, the absence of specified evaluation criteria, and the lack of e-submission functionality are significant barriers to equal access and transparency, severely impacting fairness.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission (e-submission) is a major practical drawback for a tender of this scale in 2026. The lack of an explicit document URL also hinders practical access.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no disputes or suspensions. Minor issues include 'Liable Person' missing and 'N/A' codes for procedure type, but these do not significantly impact overall consistency.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While not actively negative, this represents a missed opportunity for a high-value public contract to incorporate modern sustainability and social responsibility principles.