Legal Compliance40/100
The tender exhibits significant deficiencies in legal compliance, notably the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria. The missing reveal date also prevents verification of adequate notice periods, which are fundamental for a legally sound procurement process.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing eligibility requirements
Clarity60/100
While the core scope of work and technical capability requirements are reasonably clear and well-articulated, the complete absence of evaluation criteria, and the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements, severely diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders regarding the full tender process and selection basis.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Absence of explicit mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements
Completeness50/100
Despite the presence of basic tender information (title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, duration, CPV, NUTS), the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and, most importantly, evaluation criteria. The limited representation of tender documents also suggests potential incompleteness.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness50/100
The lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major impediment to fairness and transparency, as bidders cannot objectively understand how their proposals will be judged. The absence of e-submission capabilities also creates an unnecessary barrier to equal access. While technical requirements are specific, they appear justified by the specialized nature of the nuclear industry work and do not seem tailored to a single company.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission capabilities
Practicality60/100
The tender suffers from a significant practical drawback due to the explicit lack of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. The absence of a direct document URL also adds a minor practical hurdle. However, key dates and duration are clearly specified, aiding in planning.
•No e-submission capabilities
•No explicit document URL provided
Data Consistency85/100
The core data fields such as title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, CPV, and NUTS code are consistently populated and logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the status is active. A minor issue is the duplication of the description text and an empty 'Liable Person' field.
•Duplicated description text
•'Liable Person' field empty
Sustainability55/100
The tender explicitly highlights an 'Innovation Focus,' which contributes positively to economic and technological sustainability by fostering new solutions. However, it explicitly lacks any stated green procurement criteria or social aspects, which are increasingly important components of comprehensive sustainability in public procurement.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria