Legal Compliance75/100
The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and the 16-day period from today's date to the submission deadline is generally reasonable for an Open procedure. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and specified evaluation criteria are notable legal compliance shortcomings.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100
The description of services, sites, and operative requirements is very clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-documented. The primary deficiency is the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is crucial for bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information, deadlines, value, duration, and location details are provided. However, the tender lacks a 'Liable Person' and, critically, evaluation criteria. The fact that the only listed document is marked 'Required: No' raises significant concerns about the completeness and accessibility of the full tender documentation.
•Missing liable person
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100
The requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company, and the estimated value is disclosed. However, the absence of evaluation criteria significantly hinders transparency and equal opportunity for bidders. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission option
Practicality65/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of an e-submission option is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. A direct URL for comprehensive tender documents is also not explicitly provided.
•No e-submission option
•No explicit document URL for full tender pack
Data Consistency90/100
The core data fields are largely consistent, and dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies include the missing 'Liable Person' and 'reveal date', and the 'N/A' codes for the procedure type, but these do not severely impact overall data integrity.
•Missing liable person
•Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100
The tender includes an 'Innovation Focus' characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, it explicitly lacks green procurement and social criteria, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria