Communication Services

This tender for communication services is generally well-structured and transparent, demonstrating good adherence to procurement principles with detailed documentation. Minor areas for improvement include explicit contract start date and NUTS code provision.

The tender demonstrates good legal compliance, adhering to EU/national regulations through the use of ESPD, electronic submission, WTO/GPA principles, and explicit GDPR requirements. Mandatory exclusion grounds are clearly stated, and the submission deadline is reasonable. The generic 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes are a minor informational gap.

The tender's description is clear and unambiguous, outlining the scope of services for four years. Requirements are well-documented across various categories, and evaluation criteria (lowest monthly cost) are explicitly specified in the documents, contradicting the automated flag. Performance conditions are also clearly stated.

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines, is provided. Requirements, criteria, and detailed technical specifications are well-defined across 15 documents. Location information is available in a specific document. However, the NUTS code is missing, and the contract duration is stated in the description but not in a dedicated structured field.

The tender exhibits high fairness with full document access, disclosed value, reasonable preparation deadlines, and objective evaluation criteria based on the lowest monthly cost. E-procurement is enabled for equal access. While the requirement for 'Estonian-speaking' maintenance engineers could be seen as slightly restrictive, it is likely justified for critical hospital services. The 'agreements with equipment importers' requirement aims for supply chain reliability and does not appear to be tailored to a specific company.

Electronic submission is supported, and the tender portal URL is provided. Financing information and duration (4 years) are available. However, the exact contract start date is not explicitly stated, which could lead to minor planning ambiguities for bidders.

Data consistency is high, with key fields largely populated and logical dates. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Automated flags regarding missing evaluation criteria and location information were contradicted by the detailed document summaries, indicating the tender content itself is consistent.

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded. This is a neutral score reflecting the absence of specific sustainability criteria.