Albu-Vetepere maaparandussüsteemi ning Jõevälja tee ja Porru tee rekonstrueerimine

This tender demonstrates good foundational elements for a public procurement, utilizing standard tools like ESPD and clearly outlining basic requirements. However, it has notable gaps in completeness regarding contract duration and explicit project documentation, and lacks integration of broader sustainability objectives.

The tender appears legally compliant, incorporating mandatory exclusion grounds, utilizing the ESPD, and requiring adherence to applicable legal acts. The provision for subcontractors to address trustworthiness issues is also in line with current regulations.

The tender's title, description, and scope of works are clear. The use of ESPD and a specific price quotation form contributes to a structured and understandable submission process. The mention of 'principles of equivalence' is also a positive aspect for clarity.

While many essential elements are present, the tender is incomplete in critical areas. The absence of a specified contract duration and the lack of explicit listing or summary of detailed project documents (e.g., full technical specifications, drawings) in the provided 'DOCUMENTS' section are significant omissions.

The tender promotes fairness through the use of ESPD, mandatory exclusion grounds, and the principle of equivalence. However, the potential lack of explicitly listed detailed project documentation could inadvertently disadvantage bidders without prior knowledge or access to such information.

Electronic submission and a structured approach to bid submission (ESPD, price form) enhance practicality. However, the missing contract duration significantly hinders bidders' ability to accurately plan resources and assess project feasibility.

The provided information is consistent across the various sections, with the title, description, and requirements aligning well.

The tender includes basic compliance with environmental and personal protective equipment requirements. However, it lacks explicit green procurement, social, or innovation criteria, representing a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.