← Back to Tenders
Estonia8 days leftOpen

Energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse Basic School's educational building

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Jõgeva Vallavalitsus

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€1,655,000

DEADLINE

February 10, 2026 at 10:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45214200-2

REFERENCE

304587

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Laiuse põhikooli õppehoone energiasäästlikuks rekonstrueerimise ehitustööde tegemine
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • The tenderer and its subcontractors must meet the conditions and exclusion grounds of the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
  • Subcontractors must not be involved in criminal offenses, and the main contractor must provide information on subcontractor compliance during the contract execution phase.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • The tenderer must meet the qualification requirements as per the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD).
  • In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney for joint bidders must be submitted.
  • The tenderer must confirm the compliance of the bid with all tender conditions.
  • The tenderer must accept the terms of the draft contract.
  • The tenderer must submit a bid as a single main contractor, as the tender is not divided into parts.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Perform the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse primary school building as a main contractor.
  • Achieve the building's energy efficiency rating in accordance with energy audit package 3.
  • Ensure that greenhouse gas emissions do not increase.
  • Address and resolve deficiencies and necessary corrections identified in the construction project expert opinion.
  • Be competent and responsible for managing the entire project, including coordinating various works and protecting the building's interior, surface finishes, and inventory from damage.
  • Comply with the conditions for relying on the resources of other entities, if applicable.
  • Ensure subcontractor compliance with requirements and provide information thereof.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the bid cost according to the predefined structure.
  • Submit unit and total prices for preparation and demolition works as per the cost table.
  • Note that bids will be evaluated 100% on price, with the lowest price receiving maximum points.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) electronically.
  • Submit a power of attorney for joint bidders, if the bid is submitted jointly.
  • Justify the existence of any business secrets, if applicable.
  • Confirm compliance with the tender conditions.
  • Submit the cost using Appendix 3 Cost Table, providing unit and total prices for preparation and demolition works.
  • Adhere to the specified bid structure when submitting the bid.
  • The submission deadline for bids is 2026-02-10 at 10:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapis
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304587_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingi...20.7 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the grounds for disqualifying first-tier subcontractors during the contract execution phase, focusing on criminal convictions and requiring the main contractor to provide information regarding their subcontractors' eligibility.
PDF
Vastavustingimused
Vastavusdeklaratsioon304587_vastavustingimused.pdf7.6 KB
Summary:
This document specifies tender compliance conditions, requiring a power of attorney for joint bidders, justification for business secrets, confirmation of bid adherence to terms, and submission of costs according to the provided structure.
XLS
Pakkuja esitab Lisa 3- maksumuse tabeli
Esitamise VormidLisa 3 Maksumuse tabel.xlsx30.7 KB
Summary:
This document is Appendix 3, a cost table requiring bidders to provide unit and total prices for various preparation and demolition works for the Laiuse basic school reconstruction project.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid304587_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.9 KB
Summary:
This document outlines that bids will be evaluated 100% based on price, with the lowest offer receiving the maximum points.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304587_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...69.7 KB
Summary:
This document clarifies the conditions, exclusion grounds, and qualification criteria for the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) within the tender for the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse Basic School, which bidders must complete electronically.
DOC
Ehitusprojekti ekspertiisi arvamus
Üldine Info251024E, Laiuse koolihoone (Kuremaa tee ...2.8 MB
Summary:
This document is an expert opinion on the basic design projects for the reconstruction of Laiuse school building, detailing the responsible specialist's qualifications and areas of activity.
XLS
ekspertiisi märkuste tabel
Üldine Info251024E, Laiuse koolihoone (Kuremaa tee ...354.4 KB
Summary:
This document is a summary table of non-conformities found during the expertise of the construction project for the Laiuse school building, describing project deficiencies and necessary corrections.
DOC
juhised pakkujale
Hanke TingimusedHankedokument_Juhised pakkujale.docx33.6 KB
Summary:
This document provides instructions for bidders on the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse school building, clarifying conditions for relying on other entities' resources and guiding on bid structure and where to find required documents.
DOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidLisa 1 tehniline kirjeldus.docx30.0 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse Jaan Poska Basic School under a general contract, aiming to achieve an energy performance rating compliant with energy audit package 3 without increasing greenhouse gas emissions.
DOC
lepingu projekt
Lepingu MallLisa 2 hankelepingu projekt Laiuse.docx49.2 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft works contract outlining the legal framework, general terms, and conditions that will govern the relationship between the Jõgeva Rural Municipality Government and the selected contractor for the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse Basic School.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

87
Excellent

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the energy-efficient reconstruction of Laiuse primary school building is generally well-structured with clear administrative and technical requirements. However, the 100% price-based evaluation and some aspects of sustainability criteria raise concerns regarding achieving optimal value for money and truly ambitious environmental outcomes.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The tender appears legally compliant, adhering to standard EU procurement principles regarding exclusion grounds, qualification requirements, and the use of the ESPD.

Clarity80/100

Most requirements are clearly stated, particularly regarding submission procedures, financial structure, and the use of ESPD. However, the 'greenhouse gas emissions' requirement lacks specific metrics or a clear baseline.

•Lack of specific metrics/baseline for 'greenhouse gas emissions' requirement.
Completeness100/100

The tender provides a comprehensive set of documents and requirements covering administrative, technical, and financial aspects.

Fairness100/100

The requirement for a single main contractor, while potentially practical for project management, might limit competition for smaller or specialized firms. The 100% price-based evaluation could disadvantage bidders offering higher quality or more innovative, albeit potentially more expensive, solutions.

•Requirement for a single main contractor may limit competition.
•100% price-based evaluation may not ensure best value for money or incentivize higher quality/innovation.
Practicality60/100

The requirements for project management, coordination, and addressing expert opinion deficiencies are practical for a construction project of this nature. The 9-month contract duration seems reasonable for the scope.

Data Consistency100/100

Information provided across the basic information, description, and requirements appears consistent.

Sustainability25/100

While the project aims for 'energy-efficient reconstruction' and mentions 'greenhouse gas emissions,' the sustainability criteria are weak. The 'do not increase' emissions requirement is not ambitious for an energy-efficient project, and the 100% price evaluation discourages more sustainable, potentially higher-cost solutions. The automated check also flagged 'Not green procurement.'

•Weak and unspecific 'greenhouse gas emissions' requirement (e.g., 'do not increase' instead of 'reduce').
•100% price evaluation disincentivizes more sustainable or innovative solutions.

Strengths

Clear administrative and submission requirements, including ESPD usage.
Specific technical goal for energy efficiency rating (energy audit package 3).
Structured financial submission requirements (cost table, unit/total prices).
Proactive approach to quality by addressing expert opinion deficiencies.
Comprehensive project management and coordination expectations.

Concerns

100% price-based evaluation risks compromising quality and value for money for a complex reconstruction project.
Weak and unspecific sustainability criteria, particularly the 'do not increase' greenhouse gas emissions requirement.
Requirement for a single main contractor might limit competition, especially for smaller or specialized firms.
Lack of explicit social or innovation criteria.

Recommendations

1. Re-evaluate the evaluation criteria to include quality, technical merit, and sustainability aspects alongside price (e.g., Most Economically Advantageous Tender - MEAT).
2. Strengthen and clarify sustainability requirements with measurable targets for emission reduction and potentially lifecycle cost analysis.
3. Consider dividing the tender into lots if feasible, or clearly justify the single main contractor requirement to ensure broader market access.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
A
Tender Quality Score
87/ 100 · Excellent
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes