← Back to Tenders
Estonia1 days leftOpen

Reconstruction of Suurenõmme-Kohatu roads

Tender Overview

LOCATION

Estonia, Estonia

VALUE

€700,000

DEADLINE

February 03, 2026 at 11:00

CATEGORY

Construction

CPV CODE

45233140-2

REFERENCE

304593

Project Timeline

▼

Contact Information

▼
View Original

Original Tender Description

Hanke esemeks on Koolitoa metsatee (1,00 km), Kääbaste-Suurenõmme tee (0,37 km), Suurenõmme-Tagametsa tee (0,99 km), Lümandu-Metsanurga tee (3,39 km), Jäägri tee (1,18 km), Kirikla-Kohatu tee (1,225 km) ja Kernu-Orjaku tee (1,67 km), mis asuvad Muusika, Ruila, Tagametsa, Kirikla, Kohatu ja Kernu külas Saue vallas Harju maakonnas ning Lümandu külas Kohila vallas Rapla maakonnas.. Täpsem tööde tehniline kirjeldus on esitatud HD Lisas 2.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Subcontractors must not have grounds for exclusion such as fraud, money laundering, or human trafficking.
✓

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Confirm tender compliance.
  • Complete the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD) addressing exclusion grounds and qualification criteria.
  • Ensure first-tier subcontractors submit a procurement passport and demonstrate reliability.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Meet technical requirements for road reconstruction, including felling, stump removal, culvert construction, embankment compaction, and specified pavement material and thickness.
  • Perform reconstruction of forest roads in Saue and Kohila municipalities.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a mandatory 1500 EUR tender guarantee.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Adhere to the cost submission structure.
  • Provide a power of attorney for joint bids (if applicable).
  • Submit a price proposal form detailing work descriptions, volumes, unit prices, and total amounts.
  • Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-02-03 11:00:00.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapis
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304593_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingi...20.7 KB
Summary:
This document outlines the conditions for checking subcontractors during the contract performance phase, focusing on the grounds for exclusion of first-tier subcontractors such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, requiring them to submit a procurement passport and demonstrate reliability.
PDF
Vastavustingimused
Hanke Tingimused304593_vastavustingimused.pdf9.0 KB
Summary:
Bidders must confirm tender compliance, adhere to the cost submission structure, provide a power of attorney for joint bids, and submit a mandatory 1500 EUR tender guarantee.
XLS
Lisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vorm
Esitamise VormidLisa 1 - Hinnapakkumuse vorm_Suurenõmme-...53.8 KB
Summary:
This document is a price proposal form for the Suurenõmme-Kohatu road reconstruction tender, requiring bidders to provide work descriptions, volumes, unit prices, and total amounts.
PDF
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajad
Hindamiskriteeriumid304593_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf2.9 KB
Summary:
This document specifies that bids will be evaluated 100% based on the total cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.
PDF
Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustega
Kvalifikatsiooninõuded304593_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitusteg...72.8 KB
Summary:
This document is an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions and expected responses regarding exclusion grounds and qualification criteria, but this specific PDF does not need to be submitted.
PDF
Hankedokument
Hanke TingimusedHD_Suurenõmme-Kohatu.pdf595.3 KB
Summary:
This tender document outlines the general terms, scope of work, legal basis, and deadlines for the "Suurenõmme-Kohatu teede rekonstrueerimine" road reconstruction public procurement, referencing specific projects and legislation.
PDF
Lisa 2 - Tehniline kirjeldus
Tehnilised SpetsifikatsioonidLisa 2 - Tehniline kirjeldus.pdf279.4 KB
Summary:
This document details the technical requirements for the reconstruction of several forest roads in Saue and Kohila municipalities, including felling, stump removal, culvert construction, embankment compaction, and specifications for pavement material and thickness.
PDF
Lisa 3 - Hankelepingu vorm
Lepingu MallLisa 3 - Hankelepingu vorm.pdf681.7 KB
Summary:
This document is a draft contract outlining the scope of work for the reconstruction of Suurenõmme-Kohatu roads, detailing the rights and obligations of both the contracting authority and the contractor, and referencing the underlying projects and legal acts.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

67
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline, but suffers from a critical inconsistency regarding evaluation criteria and a lack of explicit contract duration.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with national procurement regulations, utilizing standard documents like ESPD and providing reasonable deadlines. However, the procedure type 'A' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic are not fully aligned with the stated 100% lowest price evaluation, creating a minor ambiguity.

•Ambiguity regarding the exact procedure type and the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic in conjunction with 100% lowest price evaluation.
Clarity70/100

The project description and technical requirements are clear and detailed. However, a significant clarity issue arises from the contradiction between the 'relative_weighting' characteristic in the basic information and the explicit '100% based on total cost' evaluation stated in Document 7. This could confuse bidders.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% lowest price).
Completeness70/100

Most essential information, including title, organization, value, and detailed requirements, is provided. However, the explicit contract duration is not clearly stated in the basic information or AI summaries, which is a notable omission for bidders planning.

•Missing explicit contract duration.
Fairness80/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, reasonable submission deadlines, and electronic submission. The evaluation criteria, once clarified to be 100% lowest price, are objective. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company.

•The inconsistency in evaluation criteria could temporarily impact transparency until clarified.
Practicality65/100

Electronic submission is supported, and a contract start date is provided. However, the absence of a clear contract duration makes it challenging for bidders to accurately plan resources and project timelines, impacting the practicality of bid preparation and project execution.

•Missing explicit contract duration.
Data Consistency50/100

Most data fields are populated and dates are logical. The primary and critical inconsistency lies in the conflicting statements regarding evaluation criteria: 'relative_weighting' in the characteristics versus '100% based on total cost' in the dedicated evaluation criteria document.

•Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% lowest price).
Sustainability30/100

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social, or innovation-focused criteria. It appears to be a standard infrastructure project without specific sustainability objectives.

•Absence of green, social, or innovation criteria.

Strengths

Clear and detailed technical description of works.
Value disclosed and reasonable submission deadline.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided.
Justification for not dividing into parts provided.

Concerns

Critical inconsistency in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. 100% lowest price).
Lack of explicit contract duration.
Absence of specific green, social, or innovation procurement criteria.
Ambiguity regarding the exact procurement procedure type ('Type E', 'Procedure A', 'Negotiation Allowed').

Recommendations

1. Clarify and rectify the conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria immediately.
2. Explicitly state the estimated contract duration to aid bidder planning.
3. Consider integrating sustainability, social, or innovation aspects into future tenders where applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
67/ 100 · Good
→

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes