Reconstruction of Ilmatsalu boiler house

This tender for the reconstruction of the Ilmatsalu boiler house is generally well-documented and fair, benefiting from EU funding and electronic submission. However, it suffers from a significant clarity issue regarding evaluation criteria and minor inconsistencies in basic procurement details.

The tender generally adheres to procurement principles, including reasonable deadlines and clear CPV codes. The 'EU Funded' status implies compliance with broader EU directives. However, the procurement 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes (E, MS) are undefined, which is a minor compliance oversight.

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are detailed and clear, enhanced by the explicit 'or equivalent' clauses. A significant clarity issue arises from the contradiction between 'Evaluation Criteria: relative_weighting' in the characteristics and the explicit statement in Document 10 and AI summary that bids are evaluated 'solely based on the total cost.'

The tender provides comprehensive basic information, detailed requirements, and a full set of documents. While the contract duration isn't explicitly stated in the basic info, it is expected to be defined within the attached draft contract and construction schedule.

The tender demonstrates good fairness with full document access, disclosed estimated value, and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price). The explicit inclusion of 'or equivalent' clauses for technical specifications is a strong positive, preventing tailoring to specific brands or products. E-procurement is enabled.

Electronic submission and e-procurement are supported, enhancing practicality. Financing information (EU Funded) is available. However, the contract start date is not explicitly provided, and the project duration is not immediately apparent from the basic information, requiring reference to other documents.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting statements regarding evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. 'lowest price'). The undefined 'Type' and 'Procedure' codes also contribute to minor data inconsistency.

The project itself, involving a biofuel boiler, inherently contributes to environmental sustainability. However, the tender documents do not explicitly incorporate additional green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation focus beyond the core project scope. The 'EU Funded' status implies higher general standards but doesn't automatically mean specific sustainability criteria are included.