Bürokrati arendusressursi ostmine

This tender for Bürokratt development resources is well-structured with clear technical requirements and a focus on practical capability assessment, but raises concerns regarding potential limitations to competition and the absence of sustainability criteria.

The tender appears legally compliant, utilizing standard EU procurement practices such as the Electronic Single Procurement Document (ESPD) and mandatory exclusion grounds. The procedure type (Accelerated) and EU funding are noted.

The tender provides a clear description of the required development resources and key tasks. Technical and financial requirements are generally well-defined, offering a good understanding of the project scope.

Essential information and requirements are present. However, the specific content and scope of the 'trial task' are not detailed in the provided extract, which is crucial for bidders to fully understand the assessment criteria.

The requirement to demonstrate 'understanding of Bürokratt improvements through the trial task' could potentially favor bidders with prior knowledge of the specific system, thereby limiting fair competition. The absence of division into lots for a substantial contract value may also disadvantage Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs).

The team composition requirements and the use of a trial task are practical approaches to assess technical capability for a complex IT project. The contract duration and value are substantial, reflecting the project's scope.

A minor inconsistency was noted in the 'Submission Requirements' where 'Provide hourly rates for software' appears incomplete, likely a typo for 'software developer' or 'IT specialists' as mentioned in financial requirements.

The tender lacks explicit green or social procurement criteria, missing an opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into the procurement process, as highlighted by automated checks.