Procurement of medical technologies for the Resuscitation and Operating Block of SIA “Daugavpils Regional Hospital”

This tender for medical technologies is generally well-structured with clear requirements and EU funding, but faces significant concerns regarding document accessibility and the completeness of key tender documents.

The tender defines an open procedure, specifies a CPV code, and indicates EU funding and WTO/GPA compliance, suggesting adherence to regulations. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag and the lack of extracted content for the 'Nolikumus' (tender regulations) document raise concerns about full legal disclosure and accessibility.

The tender description is clear, and AI-extracted requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission are well-defined. Evaluation criteria (warranty, energy consumption, contract price) are specified for each part. The division into parts also enhances clarity for bidders.

Basic information, financial details, timeline, and classification are comprehensively provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are defined across the specific parts. However, the 'Nolikumus' document, typically central to tender rules, has no extracted content, indicating a significant gap in the provided information, and 'Restricted document access' suggests potential incompleteness for bidders.

The tender benefits from disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, objective evaluation criteria, and e-procurement enablement. However, the 'Restricted document access' is a critical issue that severely undermines fairness, as it could prevent potential bidders from fully understanding or preparing their offers.

Electronic submission is supported, and the tender is EU funded, which often streamlines processes. The contract duration is clearly specified. The main practical concern stems from the 'Restricted document access', which could hinder bidders' ability to obtain necessary forms or detailed specifications.

The core tender data, including title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and classification, is consistently populated and logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Discrepancies noted in automated checks regarding e-submission and evaluation criteria appear to be errors in the automated system rather than the tender data itself.

The tender is EU Funded, which often implies adherence to higher standards, including sustainability. However, the provided information does not explicitly detail any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which are key components of a robust sustainability profile.