ITT 27/2025 - ICT Appointment for Castlewellan FP Tree Tops Access Linkages

This tender provides a clear project description and technical scope but suffers from significant gaps in evaluation criteria, financial details, and sustainability considerations, severely impacting fairness and completeness.

The tender defines the procedure type and assigns an appropriate CPV code. No disputes are reported. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant transparency flaw, and the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements in the provided snippet, while referring to full documents, indicates a potential gap in initial disclosure.

The project description, eligibility, and technical capability requirements are clearly articulated. However, the overall clarity for bidders is diminished by the explicit absence of evaluation criteria and detailed financial/exclusion grounds in the provided information, requiring reference to external documents for critical details.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and CPV code is present. However, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of specified evaluation criteria, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, and financial requirements in the provided data. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty, and 'Divided into Parts' lacks elaboration.

The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a critical flaw, as it undermines the objectivity and transparency of the selection process. Furthermore, the lack of e-submission capabilities limits equal access for all potential bidders. While requirements do not appear tailored, these issues significantly compromise fairness.

The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. An explicit document URL is not provided in the snippet. However, the contract start date and duration are clearly specified, aiding planning.

A notable inconsistency exists between the estimated value stated as EUR 60,000 and the document summary mentioning £50,000. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty. Otherwise, dates are logical, and no disputes are reported.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.