Traffic Data Collection Services

This tender for traffic data collection services presents significant quality concerns, primarily due to critical missing information such as evaluation criteria and major inconsistencies in key contractual details like duration and estimated value. While basic information is present and requirements are generally clear, these fundamental flaws undermine transparency, fairness, and practicality.

The tender defines the procedure and CPV code clearly, and the submission period is reasonable. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds is a notable legal oversight, potentially impacting the transparency of bidder eligibility.

The service description and AI-extracted requirements are generally clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders bidders' ability to understand how their proposals will be assessed, leading to ambiguity.

Basic tender information, deadlines, value, and location are provided. Nevertheless, the explicit lack of evaluation criteria is a major deficiency. Furthermore, only one of four tender documents has its content summarized, and it's marked as 'not required,' suggesting potential incompleteness in the provided documentation or a poorly structured tender.

The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, with encouragement for SMEs and VCSEs. However, the absence of transparent evaluation criteria introduces subjectivity and reduces fairness. The lack of e-submission also limits equal access and convenience for all potential bidders.

The contract start date is specified, but the tender suffers from a lack of e-submission and no explicit document URL. Critically, there are significant inconsistencies regarding contract duration (36 months vs. 5 years) and estimated value (EUR 150k vs. GBP 125k), which create practical confusion for bidders.

This category presents significant issues. There are direct contradictions in the stated contract duration (36 months vs. 5 years) and a major discrepancy in the estimated value and currency (EUR 150k vs. GBP 125k). Minor inconsistencies also exist in the contract start date and missing codes for procedure type. These fundamental data errors severely compromise the reliability of the tender information.

The tender shows minimal integration of sustainability principles. There is no explicit focus on green procurement, social criteria (beyond general encouragement for SMEs/VCSEs), or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.