Legal Compliance70/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of a clear reveal date and detailed mandatory exclusion/financial grounds in the provided summary indicates potential gaps in standard legal disclosures.
•Missing reveal date
•Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds
Clarity45/100
While the overall description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency. This significantly hinders potential bidders' understanding of how their applications will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds
Completeness50/100
Basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration are present. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of specified evaluation criteria, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, and specific financial requirements. Only one document summary is provided, suggesting further critical documentation might be missing from this overview.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No detailed mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness55/100
The tender benefits from a very long submission deadline for joining the DPS and generic, non-tailored requirements, promoting broad participation. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely undermines transparency and fairness, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive applications. The contradiction regarding e-submission also raises minor fairness concerns.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Contradiction on e-submission
Practicality60/100
The tender lists "E-Procurement" as a characteristic, but automated checks indicate "No e-submission," creating ambiguity. The lack of a direct document URL also presents a practical hurdle for interested parties to access full tender details efficiently.
•Ambiguity regarding e-submission
•No direct document URL
Data Consistency65/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical for a DPS. The primary inconsistency lies in the contradiction between "E-Procurement" being a characteristic and the automated check stating "No e-submission." Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for procedure type.
•Contradiction regarding e-submission
•Missing 'Liable Person'
Sustainability90/100
The tender explicitly integrates strong sustainability aspects, including a focus on reducing environmental impact, adding social value, and promoting innovation through technology-enabled living and integrated care.