Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines an open procedure and assigns an appropriate CPV code. The submission period of 19 days is generally acceptable. However, the absence of a 'Liable Person' and the lack of specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements in the summary are notable gaps that could impact full legal compliance if not detailed in the full documents.
•Missing 'Liable Person'
•No specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, or financial requirements detailed in the summary
Clarity60/100
The description of services and technical capability requirements are clear and understandable. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements in the summary significantly reduces the overall clarity of the tender process for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, or financial requirements detailed in the summary
Completeness55/100
Basic information such as title, organization, value, deadlines, duration, and location are provided. Nevertheless, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the explicit absence of evaluation criteria, detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements in the summary. Only one out of four documents has a content summary, suggesting potential gaps in the provided overview.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, or financial requirements detailed in the summary
Fairness40/100
The estimated value is disclosed, and technical requirements appear generic, not tailored. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a critical flaw, undermining transparency and fairness by preventing bidders from understanding how their proposals will be assessed. The lack of e-submission also limits equal access.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No electronic submission (e-submission) supported
Practicality65/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback, potentially increasing administrative burden for bidders. The absence of a direct document URL in the provided information and specific financing details beyond the estimated value also slightly impacts practicality.
•No electronic submission (e-submission) supported
•No direct document URL provided in the summary
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the missing 'Liable Person' and a slight discrepancy between the estimated value in EUR and the GBP value mentioned in the document summary.
•Missing 'Liable Person'
•Slight discrepancy in estimated value (EUR vs GBP in document summary)
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This indicates a significant missed opportunity to integrate modern procurement best practices.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social criteria