Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines an Open procedure and uses an appropriate CPV code. The submission period of 25 days from today's date is reasonable. Basic disclosure requirements appear to be met, and there are no reported disputes.
•Missing explicit reveal date in the provided text.
Clarity60/100
The service description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of detailed evaluation criteria beyond 'Most Advantageous Tender' significantly reduces clarity regarding how bids will be assessed.
•No detailed evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness65/100
Most essential information like title, organization, value, deadlines, and duration is provided. Requirements are outlined. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria and the limited summary of only one out of four tender documents indicate potential gaps in the publicly available information.
•Missing detailed evaluation criteria
•Limited visibility into full tender documents.
Fairness60/100
Full document access is implied via provided URLs, and e-procurement is enabled. The value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic. However, the absence of transparent and objective evaluation criteria is a major concern for ensuring fair competition. The requirement for a single supplier for two lots could also slightly limit competition.
•Lack of detailed, objective, and transparent evaluation criteria.
Practicality85/100
Electronic submission is clearly supported via an e-tendering portal, and all necessary URLs are provided. Key dates like contract start and duration are well-defined, enhancing practicality for bidders.
Data Consistency80/100
Key fields are largely populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent, although the overall contract duration could be more explicitly linked to the specific lots. The 'Liable Person' field is empty.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
•Minor ambiguity in overall contract duration vs. lot-specific durations.
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not EU funded.
•No sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.