Dynamic Purchasing System for the Provision of Digital Services for Co-Managed Care

This tender establishes a collaborative Dynamic Purchasing System for digital services in co-managed care, demonstrating good overall structure but lacking detailed requirements and evaluation criteria in the initial notice.

The tender clearly defines the procedure as a Restricted procedure (DPS) and assigns an appropriate CPV code. Deadlines are very reasonable. While specific legal codes are marked N/A, the procedure type is clear. The notice defers detailed mandatory exclusion grounds to full documents, which is standard for a notice but limits immediate compliance visibility.

The description of the DPS and its seven categories is clear and unambiguous. However, critical details such as specific technical, financial, mandatory exclusion, and especially evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 'not specified in the provided contract notice' and require reference to full tender documents, significantly reducing the clarity of the notice itself.

Basic information like title, reference, organization, value, duration, and CPV code are well-provided. However, the notice is incomplete regarding detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, specific technical capabilities, and evaluation criteria, all of which are deferred to the full tender documents.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the submission deadline provides ample time for preparation. Requirements for eligibility and technical capability, as presented in the notice, appear generic and not tailored. E-procurement is listed as a characteristic, promoting equal access. The primary concern for fairness is the absence of evaluation criteria in the notice, which reduces transparency.

The tender supports e-procurement, which is a practical advantage. The contract duration is specified. However, a direct URL for tender documents is not provided in the basic information, and the exact contract start date is not known, which can hinder immediate access and planning.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical and consistent. A minor inconsistency exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag, and the 'Liable Person' field is empty.

The tender explicitly highlights an 'Innovation Focus,' which is a strong positive for sustainability. However, there is no mention of specific green procurement criteria or social aspects, limiting its overall sustainability scope.