Legal Compliance65/100
The tender provides a reasonable submission period and correct CPV codes. However, the absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, 'N/A' codes for procedure type, and the contradictory 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a stated estimated value are notable concerns. The 'reserved for UK SMEs' clause, while potentially permissible for below-threshold national procurement, restricts competition.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•'Code: N/A' for type/procedure
Clarity55/100
While the service description is clear, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements. The mention of the contract being 'Divided into Parts' is not elaborated, and the AI-extracted requirements highlight the absence of exclusion ground details.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No detailed requirements
Completeness50/100
Basic information like title, organization, and deadlines are present. However, the tender is incomplete regarding crucial elements such as evaluation criteria, specific detailed requirements, and a clear status for all attached documents (e.g., 'Required: No' for the main PDF). The 'Liable Person' field is empty, and there's a currency inconsistency in the estimated value.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Specific requirements not detailed
Fairness45/100
The absence of explicit evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, hindering transparent assessment. The lack of e-submission and the 'reserved for UK SMEs' clause limit equal access and competition. The contradictory 'Value Classified: Yes' also reduces transparency.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality60/100
The contract duration and start date are clearly specified. However, the lack of electronic submission support and the absence of an explicit document URL for all tender documents present practical hurdles for potential bidders.
•No e-submission
•No explicit document URL provided
Data Consistency65/100
Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no disputes. However, there are several inconsistencies: currency difference in the estimated value (£ vs EUR), 'Value Classified: Yes' contradicting the stated value, and 'Code: N/A' for procedure types. The 'Required: No' status for the main PDF is also confusing.
•Currency inconsistency (£ vs EUR)
•'Value Classified: Yes' contradicts stated value
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit green, social, or innovation criteria. While the 'reserved for UK SMEs' clause supports local economic development, it does not align with broader sustainability objectives.
•No green, social, or innovation criteria mentioned