Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and states compliance with UK regulations. Deadlines for joining the rolling framework are reasonable for current applicants. However, the lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary and the contradictory 'Value Classified: Yes' flag alongside a disclosed value are minor concerns.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in summary
•"Value Classified: Yes" contradiction
Clarity55/100
While the overall description of the framework and categories of need is clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed requirements (beyond categories) significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders. The AI-extracted requirements highlight this gap.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Lack of detailed requirements
Completeness65/100
Basic information, financial details, and duration are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the missing explicit evaluation criteria and the lack of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided information, which are essential for a comprehensive bid.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in summary
Fairness45/100
The rolling framework and e-procurement support fairness by allowing continuous access. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the procurement process, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality75/100
The tender supports e-procurement and clearly specifies the contract duration. While a direct document URL and explicit contract start date are not provided in the snippets, the overall practical elements for participation appear to be in place.
•No explicit document URL in snippets
•Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency85/100
Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical for a rolling framework. The main inconsistency is the "Value Classified: Yes" flag despite the value being disclosed, and the empty "Liable Person" field.
•"Value Classified: Yes" contradiction
•Empty "Liable Person" field
Sustainability60/100
The tender's core purpose is the provision of fostering services, which inherently addresses significant social needs. While explicit "green" or "innovation" criteria are not mentioned, the fundamental social impact of the procurement is high.
•No explicit green or innovation criteria