Academic Health Science Network NENC DPS

This tender establishes a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) for innovation support services, demonstrating good clarity in its purpose and structure, but suffers from significant gaps in transparency regarding evaluation criteria and estimated value.

The tender outlines a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), which is a compliant procurement procedure. The submission deadline is exceptionally long, providing ample time for preparation. However, there is an inconsistency in the stated procedure type (Restricted vs. DPS in description), and the reveal date is missing. The estimated value is classified, which, while not strictly non-compliant for a DPS, reduces transparency.

The description of the Academic Health Science Network NENC, its 'Innovation Pathway,' and the purpose of the DPS, including the five lots, is very clear and well-articulated. However, a critical omission is the lack of specified evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS and for subsequent call-offs, which significantly impacts overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, and CPV codes are provided. The duration and submission deadline are clear. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, detailed financial requirements are missing, and, most notably, the evaluation criteria are absent, which are crucial components for a complete tender.

The establishment of a DPS, coupled with an exceptionally long submission deadline and e-procurement support, generally promotes fair access. However, the classified estimated value and the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria for both DPS admission and subsequent mini-competitions severely undermine transparency and objectivity, raising concerns about potential subjectivity in supplier selection.

The tender supports electronic submission via a provided URL, making the application process practical. The contract duration is clearly specified. While the contract start date is not explicit, it is implied by the DPS nature. The lack of financing information (estimated value) could pose minor practical challenges for bidders in resource planning.

Most key fields are populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical. However, there is an inconsistency where the tender is initially classified as 'Restricted' procedure but then described as a 'Dynamic Purchasing System' (DPS), which operates differently. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The tender has a strong inherent focus on innovation, which is a positive aspect. However, it does not explicitly include any green procurement criteria or social aspects, which are increasingly important considerations in modern public procurement.