Ailgylchu Gwastraff Priffyrdd MTCBC MTCBC Highways Waste Recycling

This tender for highways waste recycling services demonstrates good foundational information but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria, financial requirements, and the absence of e-submission, impacting fairness and clarity for potential bidders.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and assigns an appropriate CPV code. The submission deadline, from today's date, appears reasonable. However, the provided information explicitly states that mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria are not detailed, which are fundamental for legal compliance and transparency in public procurement.

The description of the required recycling services and waste types is clear and unambiguous. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly diminishes the overall clarity for bidders, making it difficult to understand how their proposals will be assessed. Performance conditions are also not explicitly detailed.

The tender includes essential basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location. While requirements are outlined, the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements (beyond the estimated value) makes the tender incomplete from a bidder's perspective.

The tender's estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements do not appear to be tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria introduces subjectivity and potential for unfairness in the assessment process. Furthermore, the lack of e-submission capabilities limits equal access and modern procurement practices.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. A direct document URL is not provided in the summary, and detailed financial requirements are not explicitly stated, potentially complicating bid preparation.

The tender information is largely consistent across the provided fields, with logical dates and no reported disputes or suspensions. A minor inconsistency exists between the stated contract duration (48 months) and the PDF summary's mention of "4-6 years." The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The core service of "Refuse recycling services" inherently contributes to environmental sustainability. However, the tender does not explicitly incorporate additional green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus beyond the fundamental service, as indicated by automated checks.