PRP291 Servicing and Repairs of Air Conditioning and Air Handling Units/ Heating Ventilation (HVAC

This tender provides basic information but suffers from significant gaps in detailed requirements, evaluation criteria, and practical features like e-submission, severely impacting its clarity, completeness, and fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the missing reveal date, lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and absence of specified financial requirements and evaluation criteria are significant gaps in compliance with standard procurement transparency and regulatory principles.

While the overall service description is clear, the AI-extracted requirements are very high-level, explicitly stating 'No specific requirements explicitly stated' for mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements. Crucially, the absence of specified evaluation criteria beyond a general weighting for technical quality creates significant ambiguity for bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender is significantly incomplete regarding critical details like mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and, most notably, detailed evaluation criteria.

The estimated value is disclosed, and stated eligibility requirements are generic. However, fairness is significantly undermined by the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria, which limits transparency and objectivity. The lack of e-submission creates a barrier to equal access, and the missing reveal date prevents a full assessment of deadline reasonableness.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the tender lacks key practical features such as electronic submission, which is a significant drawback in modern procurement. A direct document URL is also not provided in the summary, potentially hindering easy access to full tender documents.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. However, a significant inconsistency exists in the estimated value, with the basic information stating '480,000.00 EUR' while the document summary mentions '£400,000'. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty.

The tender explicitly lacks any mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, as confirmed by the automated check results. The absence of these criteria indicates a significant missed opportunity to incorporate broader public value considerations.