PSSR Asset – Pre Inspection enablement

This tender provides a clear description of the required services for PSSR asset inspections but suffers from significant omissions, particularly the complete absence of evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, which severely impact fairness and legal compliance. Practicality and data consistency are also hampered by missing information and contradictions.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and no disputes are reported. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds represents a significant compliance gap for a public procurement process. The 'Missing reveal date' also points to a transparency issue.

The description of the required services, assets, and regulatory context is very clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are also well-articulated. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria makes the overall bidding and selection process unclear for potential suppliers.

While basic information, financial details, and duration are provided, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit lack of evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds. The 'Required: No' status for the only listed document also raises questions about the completeness of accessible tender documentation.

The complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as it prevents bidders from understanding how their proposals will be assessed, leading to potential subjectivity. While the requirements are specific, they appear to be driven by regulatory necessity rather than tailoring. The contradiction regarding e-submission also introduces ambiguity.

The tender lacks a direct URL for accessing full documents, which is a practical hurdle for bidders. The contract start date is not specified, and there's an inconsistency regarding whether e-submission is supported, which can complicate the submission process.

A significant inconsistency exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated check result. Additionally, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and critical details like mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria are missing, indicating incomplete data population.

The tender does not include any specific criteria or focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.