Legal Compliance65/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal transparency and compliance issue, as it hinders fair competition and objective assessment. The reveal date is also missing.
•Missing reveal date
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity70/100
The project description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear, detailed, and unambiguous, providing a good understanding of the scope of work. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100
The tender includes essential information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, duration, and location. While technical requirements are detailed, the tender is incomplete due to the absence of specified evaluation criteria and the liable person's details.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Liable Person missing
Fairness60/100
The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, electronic submission via eTenderWales, and seemingly generic technical requirements that do not appear tailored. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to compete fairly.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality80/100
The tender supports electronic submission, clearly states the contract start date and duration, enhancing practicality for bidders. While a direct document URL is not explicitly provided in the summary, the mention of documents implies accessibility.
•Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency85/100
The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates, no reported disputes, and most key fields populated. Minor inconsistencies include the missing liable person and reveal date.
•Liable Person missing
•Missing reveal date
Sustainability25/100
The tender does not include any explicit requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, nor is it indicated as EU-funded. This represents a missed opportunity for incorporating sustainability principles.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria