Cafe Concession Contracts for DGLAM and Vibe

This tender provides clear basic information but suffers from significant deficiencies in detailed requirements and, critically, the complete absence of evaluation criteria, posing risks to fairness and transparency.

While the procedure type and CPV codes are correct, and the submission window is reasonable (19 days), the absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements in the summary raises concerns about full legal compliance and transparency principles.

The service description is clear, but the AI-extracted technical requirements are very vague ('high-quality service'), and crucially, evaluation criteria are explicitly missing, making it difficult for bidders to understand expectations.

Basic administrative information is complete, but critical elements such as detailed eligibility, financial, and technical requirements, and especially evaluation criteria, are either missing or insufficiently defined.

The complete absence of evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as it introduces subjectivity into the award process. The lack of e-submission also limits equal access for potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission is a significant practical drawback for bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' codes for procedure type.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity for broader public value.