Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure as an Open Dynamic Purchasing System under the Light Touch Regime, with an appropriate CPV code. The long submission deadline is suitable for a DPS. However, the 'Missing reveal date' is a minor administrative compliance issue.
Clarity60/100
The overall description of the DPS is clear and unambiguous. However, the notice explicitly defers critical details such as mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements to full application documents. Crucially, evaluation criteria for accreditation to the DPS are not specified, significantly impacting clarity.
•No evaluation criteria specified in the notice
•Mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements not detailed in the notice
Completeness65/100
Basic information like title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and duration are well-specified. However, the tender is incomplete regarding detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and, most importantly, evaluation criteria, which are essential for a comprehensive understanding of the application process.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements not provided in the notice
Fairness55/100
The long submission deadline and support for e-procurement contribute positively to fairness. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria for accreditation to the DPS is a major fairness concern, as it undermines transparency and objectivity.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting transparency and objectivity
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the lack of a direct URL for accessing the full application documents is a practical hurdle for potential bidders. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, which is a minor practical detail.
•No direct URL provided for full application documents
•Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent with a DPS. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. A minor inconsistency exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag, which is disregarded in favor of the explicit characteristic.
Sustainability40/100
While the service itself (residential and nursing care) has inherent social value, the tender notice does not explicitly incorporate broader green procurement, additional social criteria beyond the core service, or innovation focus. It is not EU funded.
•No explicit green procurement criteria
•No explicit social criteria beyond the core service