Legal Compliance65/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and no disputes are reported. However, the absence of a reveal date, undisclosed estimated value, and lack of specific details for mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, and financial requirements represent significant compliance gaps.
•Missing tender reveal date
•Estimated value not disclosed
Clarity55/100
The service description and technical capability requirements are clearly articulated. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and crucially, evaluation criteria, severely diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders.
•No specific details for mandatory exclusion grounds
•No specific details for eligibility requirements
Completeness50/100
While basic information like title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration are present, critical elements such as the estimated value, detailed mandatory exclusion/eligibility/financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are explicitly missing. The 'Official PDF Version' being marked as 'Required: No' is also a concern for full document completeness.
•Estimated value not disclosed
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness45/100
The lack of disclosed estimated value and, more critically, the absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly undermine the fairness and transparency of the procurement process. While technical requirements appear generic and e-procurement is indicated, these omissions create an uneven playing field.
•Estimated value not disclosed
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100
The tender supports E-Procurement and clearly specifies the contract duration, which are positive for practicality. However, the absence of a direct document URL, unknown contract start date, and undisclosed financing information (value) reduce its overall practicality for bidders.
•No document URL provided
•Contract start date not known
Data Consistency60/100
The tender shows consistency in dates and absence of disputes. However, several key fields are unpopulated (e.g., Liable Person, various requirements). A notable inconsistency exists between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the automated check's 'No e-submission' flag, as well as the 'Required: No' status for the main PDF document.
•Several key fields unpopulated (e.g., Liable Person, various requirements)
•Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag
Sustainability25/100
The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on broader sustainability objectives.
•No green procurement aspects mentioned
•No social aspects mentioned