Legal Compliance55/100
The tender explicitly states it is not subject to the Procurement Act 2023, which significantly alters the legal framework and raises questions about the extent of standard public procurement principles applied. Key deficiencies include a missing reveal date, undisclosed value, and the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and evaluation criteria, which would typically be non-compliant under standard procurement law.
•Explicit exemption from Procurement Act 2023 creates legal ambiguity regarding standard safeguards
•Missing reveal date prevents assessment of adequate preparation time
Clarity60/100
The tender's purpose and the nature of the IP panel are clearly described, and the AI-extracted requirements are understandable. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity flaw, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness55/100
Basic information, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and evaluation criteria are missing. The fact that only one of four documents was summarized suggests potential incompleteness in the provided tender documentation.
•Estimated value is not disclosed
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness35/100
While e-procurement is enabled, the undisclosed estimated value and, critically, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely undermine transparency and fair competition. Bidders cannot objectively prepare proposals or understand the basis of selection, which is a fundamental fairness concern.
•Estimated value is not disclosed
•No evaluation criteria specified, severely impacting transparency and objectivity
Practicality70/100
Electronic submission via Atamis and access to supporting documents are well-supported. The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The primary practical drawback is the undisclosed estimated value, which hinders firms' ability to assess the commercial viability of joining the panel.
•Estimated value is not disclosed, hindering commercial assessment
Data Consistency75/100
The provided data is largely consistent where present. However, several key fields such as 'Liable Person', 'Estimated Value', and specific procedure codes are unpopulated or marked N/A, and mandatory exclusion grounds are noted as not provided.
•Several key fields (e.g., Liable Person, Estimated Value, specific codes) are unpopulated or N/A
•Mandatory exclusion grounds are not explicitly provided
Sustainability20/100
The tender provides no indication of incorporating green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not EU funded.
•No green procurement criteria
•No social aspects included