Children and Young People's Advocacy and Independent Visitor Service

This tender for Children and Young People's Advocacy services demonstrates good foundational information and electronic access, but suffers from significant gaps in clarity and completeness regarding evaluation criteria and full bidder requirements. Key details are referred to an external portal, and there are minor data inconsistencies.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code clearly, and there are no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable from today's date. However, the reveal date is missing, and full mandatory exclusion grounds and financial requirements are referred to an external portal, which, while standard, means the provided snippet is not fully self-contained for a comprehensive compliance check.

The description of services and the three offers is clear and unambiguous. However, a major concern is the explicit absence of specified evaluation criteria, which significantly impacts a bidder's ability to understand how their submission will be judged. Full details on mandatory exclusion and financial requirements are also not provided directly.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, estimated value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender is incomplete regarding critical details like evaluation criteria, and full mandatory exclusion and financial requirements are not detailed in the provided text, requiring external access.

Full document access via the specified portal and disclosure of the estimated value contribute positively to fairness. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant concern, as it can lead to subjective assessment and reduce transparency. The requirement for a 'single provider' for all three offers, while potentially justified for integrated services, could limit competition.

The tender supports electronic submission via a specified portal and provides a clear URL for accessing documents. The contract start date and duration are clearly stated, enhancing practicality for potential bidders. Basic financing information (estimated value) is available.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. However, a notable inconsistency exists in the estimated value, which is stated in EUR in the basic information but in GBP (ex VAT) in the PDF summary, with differing numerical values.

While the core service itself is inherently social, the tender does not explicitly incorporate additional green procurement criteria, social clauses for bidders, or an innovation focus within its requirements or evaluation. It is also not EU funded.