Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements represents a notable gap in compliance with standard procurement regulations.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Missing explicit eligibility requirements.
Clarity80/100
The description of services and technical capability requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100
Basic information like title, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are present. Nevertheless, critical elements such as mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing, making the tender incomplete.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Missing eligibility requirements.
Fairness65/100
The lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as bidders cannot objectively understand the basis for award. Ambiguity regarding e-procurement and potentially limited access to comprehensive tender documents also detract from equal opportunity.
•No evaluation criteria specified, hindering objective assessment.
•Ambiguity regarding e-procurement/e-submission.
Practicality60/100
The tender lists 'E-Procurement' as a characteristic, but automated checks indicate 'No e-submission', creating a practical ambiguity. The absence of a clear document URL for full tender documents also poses a practical challenge for bidders.
•Unclear electronic submission process/platform.
•No explicit document URL provided for full tender documents.
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. The primary inconsistency lies in the 'E-Procurement' characteristic conflicting with the 'No e-submission' flag from automated checks.
•Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag.
Sustainability50/100
While the service inherently addresses a social need, the tender does not explicitly incorporate broader green procurement, social clauses beyond the core service, or innovation-focused criteria. The recycling aspect is a positive but is part of the core service delivery.
•No explicit green procurement criteria.
•No explicit social criteria beyond the core service.