RMH - BEMS Consultancy

This tender for BEMS consultancy services is generally clear and well-structured with detailed requirements, but it suffers from significant practical and fairness issues due to the lack of electronic submission and a missing reveal date.

The tender specifies a Restricted procedure and references mandatory exclusion grounds, indicating an intent for legal compliance. However, the critical absence of a reveal date prevents a proper assessment of the reasonableness of the submission period, which is a key legal requirement. Procedure codes are also marked N/A.

The description of services is clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements are exceptionally well-defined, categorized, and comprehensive. Evaluation criteria (60% quality, 40% price) are explicitly stated, providing good transparency.

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, CPV, and NUTS code, is present. Detailed requirements and evaluation criteria are also provided. The main gaps are the missing reveal date and N/A codes for procedure types.

The tender discloses the estimated value and provides clear, objective evaluation criteria. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. However, the significant drawback is the explicit lack of electronic submission, which hinders equal access and transparency in modern procurement. The missing reveal date also creates uncertainty regarding adequate preparation time.

The absence of electronic submission is a major practical impediment, making the process less efficient and accessible for bidders. While contract duration and start date are clear, a direct document URL is not explicitly provided, which is a minor inconvenience.

Most data fields are consistent. However, the submission deadline and contract start date being identical is an unusual and potentially inconsistent timeline. The reveal date is missing, and some procedure codes are N/A. The contradiction regarding evaluation criteria was resolved by prioritizing the detailed AI-extracted content.

The tender explicitly mentions 'Innovation Focus,' which is a positive characteristic. However, it lacks explicit green procurement criteria or social aspects, and it is not EU funded, limiting its overall sustainability profile. While BEMS inherently relates to energy efficiency, it is not explicitly framed as a green procurement initiative.