Subject Matter Experts for Early Language, Early Maths and Personal, Social and Emotional Development Learning Leads

This tender outlines a clear need for subject matter experts in early education but suffers from significant omissions regarding evaluation criteria and detailed exclusion grounds, impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness. The lack of e-submission also presents a practical barrier.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and there are no reported disputes. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds is a significant legal compliance concern, as these are fundamental requirements for a transparent and lawful procurement process.

The description of the required services is clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds severely diminishes the overall clarity for potential bidders, making it difficult to prepare a compliant and competitive offer.

While basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and CPV code are present, the tender is incomplete due to the critical omission of evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds. The lack of a full set of accessible tender documents (only one summary provided) also contributes to incompleteness.

The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major fairness issue, as bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged. The lack of an e-submission option also reduces equal access and convenience for potential suppliers, hindering a truly fair and open competition.

The tender's practicality is significantly hampered by the lack of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. The absence of a direct document URL also adds an unnecessary barrier for interested parties to access full tender documentation.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and 'N/A' for procedure codes, but these do not significantly impact overall data integrity.

The tender explicitly includes an 'Innovation Focus,' which is a positive aspect for sustainability. However, it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement or specific social aspects for bidders, beyond the inherent social benefit of the project itself.