Landscape contract

This tender provides clear basic information and technical requirements but suffers from significant gaps in critical areas such as explicit legal, financial, and eligibility requirements, and notably, the complete absence of evaluation criteria.

The tender lacks an explicit reveal date, making it impossible to assess the reasonableness of the submission period. Furthermore, mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements are not explicitly stated in the provided summary, requiring bidders to refer to full documents, which is a disclosure weakness.

While the description of services and technical capabilities is clear, the tender explicitly states that eligibility, financial, and mandatory exclusion requirements are not detailed in the summary. Crucially, evaluation criteria are entirely missing, significantly hindering bidders' understanding of the award process.

Basic tender information, including title, reference, organization, value, duration, and deadlines, is present. However, the tender is significantly incomplete due to the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion, eligibility, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria in the provided information. The discrepancy in the number of documents listed versus detailed is also a concern.

The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as it compromises transparency and objectivity in the award process. The lack of an explicit reveal date prevents a full assessment of reasonable preparation time, and the absence of e-submission limits equal access for all potential bidders.

The tender lacks support for electronic submission, which is a significant practical drawback in modern procurement. A direct document URL is also not provided. While contract start date and duration are clear, the absence of e-submission and a direct link to documents reduces the practicality for bidders.

Several inconsistencies are present, including "Value Classified: Yes" contradicting the disclosed estimated value, "Characteristics: Divided into Parts" without further elaboration, and a discrepancy between the total number of documents and those detailed. The "Liable Person" field is also empty.

The tender does not include any specific green procurement, social, or innovation aspects. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of focus on broader sustainability objectives.