Carriage of hazardous chemicals and dangerous goods training

This tender provides a clear description of the required training services but suffers from critical omissions, particularly the lack of evaluation criteria, which significantly impacts its fairness and legal compliance.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no disputes. However, the absence of a reveal date and, more critically, the complete lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance issues, undermining transparency and equal treatment principles.

The description of the required training and the AI-extracted requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria makes it unclear for bidders how their proposals will be assessed, which is a major clarity deficit.

Basic information, financial details, and timelines are well-defined. However, the critical omission of evaluation criteria is a major completeness flaw. Additionally, only one of four documents is summarized, and the main PDF is listed as 'Required: No', raising concerns about full document visibility.

The estimated value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic rather than tailored. Electronic submission via a portal supports equal access. Nevertheless, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the evaluation process, posing a significant fairness concern.

Electronic submission via the Jaggaer portal is supported, and the contract start date and duration are clear. However, the lack of a direct document URL and the confusing 'Required: No' status for the official PDF create practical hurdles for potential bidders.

The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no reported disputes. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and the missing reveal date. The contradiction regarding e-submission between AI-extracted and automated checks is noted but the AI-extracted is prioritized.

The tender does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.