Legal Compliance45/100
The tender exhibits significant deficiencies in legal compliance. Critical information such as the tender reveal date, mandatory exclusion grounds, specific financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are explicitly missing. The procedure type codes are also marked as N/A. These omissions represent fundamental non-compliance with standard procurement regulations.
•Missing reveal date
•No mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Clarity60/100
While the description of the services and the division into lots is clear and understandable, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria severely impacts the overall clarity for potential bidders. This makes it difficult for suppliers to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness50/100
The tender provides basic information like title, reference, organization, value, and duration. However, it is significantly incomplete due to the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, specific financial requirements, and, most critically, evaluation criteria. The 'Liable Person' field is also unpopulated.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Fairness40/100
The fairness of the tender is compromised by several factors. The lack of specified evaluation criteria makes the assessment process opaque. The absence of e-submission limits equal access for all potential bidders. Furthermore, the missing reveal date prevents an assessment of the reasonableness of the preparation period, and the 'Required: No' status for the official PDF is concerning regarding document access.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No e-submission
Practicality35/100
Practicality is severely hampered by the lack of electronic submission, which creates an unnecessary barrier for bidders. A critical flaw is the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline, which is illogical and practically impossible.
•No e-submission
•Contract start date identical to submission deadline
Data Consistency40/100
The tender exhibits several data inconsistencies. The contract start date is illogically set to the same time as the submission deadline. Key fields like 'Liable Person' are unpopulated, and procedure type codes are marked as N/A. The "Required: No" status for the Official PDF document also indicates an inconsistency.
•Contract start date identical to submission deadline
•Liable Person missing
Sustainability50/100
The tender includes an 'Innovation Focus' characteristic, which is a positive aspect for sustainability. However, it explicitly lacks any green procurement or social criteria, indicating a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria