Legal Compliance75/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure as a DPS under Scottish Regulations, and the CPV code is appropriate. The submission deadline provides ample time for a continuously open DPS. However, the missing reveal date and lack of explicit financial requirements for initial DPS application are minor concerns.
•Missing reveal date
•No specific financial requirements explicitly stated for initial DPS application
Clarity60/100
The description of the services, the 'No One Left Behind' strategy, and the AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified for DPS admission
Completeness65/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and CPV code are well-provided. However, the tender lacks explicit evaluation criteria and specific financial requirements for initial DPS application. The 'Required: No' status for the 'Official PDF Version' is also ambiguous.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•No specific financial requirements explicitly stated
Fairness60/100
The tender's requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, and the value is disclosed. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria for DPS admission is a major fairness concern, as bidders cannot understand the basis of selection. A contradiction regarding e-procurement also raises minor questions.
•No evaluation criteria specified for DPS admission
•Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' automated issue
Practicality65/100
The duration is clearly specified. While 'E-Procurement' is listed as a characteristic, the automated check flags 'No e-submission', creating an inconsistency. A direct document URL is not provided, and the contract start date is not explicitly stated.
•Contradiction regarding e-submission capabilities
•Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency70/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a notable contradiction between the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and the 'No e-submission' automated issue. Similarly, the 'Sustainability' characteristics (Innovation, Social) conflict with the 'Not green procurement' automated flag. Some fields like 'Liable Person' are empty.
•Contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' automated issue
•Contradiction between sustainability characteristics and automated check result
Sustainability80/100
The tender explicitly highlights 'Innovation Focus' and 'Social Criteria' as characteristics. The 'No One Left Behind (NOLB)' strategy demonstrates a strong commitment to social aspects, supporting unemployed and low-income individuals. While not explicitly 'green', its social and innovation focus contributes significantly to sustainability.
•Not explicitly focused on 'green' procurement aspects